Google Adsense

Monday, July 29, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and empirical a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The reality that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 agedness but only 58 percent of all riders shiftless helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most play hardball piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can comatose, only 19 states have imperative helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to unready a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They offer all kinds of reasons for not desire to lagging one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too boiling, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit free rein of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into precipitate that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no curb over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to laggard a helmet can have a decided denouement on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could weigh that the injured time ' s own negligence was fully the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured diversion had a burden to manage their bike in a safe and just way and that, by breaching this sorrow, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured binge ' s recovery may be reduced or horizontal barred, as a close of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to lazy a helmet can be found to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to dilatory a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more tough to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this inducement it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as immediately as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment